Action Research vs. Traditional Education Research:
I have learned that action research differs from traditional
research in that is actively seeks to change something immediately while
seeking data and research to prove what is best for a campus. It is a way for administrators to inquire
about issues on campus, actively work to see if change is needed, and implement
change quicker than we have done in the past. Traditionally education research
has been reactive in that it simply collects data to understand what is
happening after it is obvious that something is not working. Change does not necessarily go hand in hand
with traditional education research because it is simply data driven.
Implementing Action Research on My Campus:
I am considering using action research on my campus to
assist my principal in looking into the effectiveness of Professional Learning
Communities on our campus. Our school
district is strongly pushing towards effective and active use of PLCs on every
campus, but teachers seem to be struggling with how to implement this into
their planning. Many teachers are
confusing PLC time with common planning time, and I want to conduct research to
find out what teachers know about PLCs, how teachers feel about PLCs, and how effective
PLCs can improve student progress. If I
am able to effectively research this process, I will be able to help reduce
stress on both teachers and administrators.
This could also greatly improve teacher assessments so that our school
creates the most beneficial assessments for student learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment